Page 3 of 3: businesses ranked 201-284 of 284. Ranked by score and relevance, start from the top or open the full map view.
Most customers praise rapid emergency response, skilled project management, and thorough restoration work, especially when handled by experienced leads. However, a small number report serious follow-up lapses and unresponsive communication from certain project managers, leaving damage unresolved for months.
Strong technical performance on water, fire, and flood damage mitigation, with crews praised for professionalism and attention to detail. However, serious concerns arise from multiple reports of aggressive driving by marked company vehicles and at least one complaint of sloppy workmanship, long delays, and unfinished repairs after years of waiting.
Most customers praise Prime Restoration for swift arrival, professional crew work, and clear communication during water damage and fire incidents. Two reviews flag serious concerns: one detailed litigation over unauthorized work and inflated billing at a condo, and another criticized appointment coordination delays and lack of updates during the job.
All seven reviews rate the business five stars over a span of several years. Callers report quick arrival, skilled technicians, and resolved mold and water damage problems with minimal hassle.
All 11 reviews rate Select Restoration at five stars. Reviewers consistently praise rapid response, especially for weekend and after-hours calls, and note staff handled everything from initial assessment through insurance coordination and finishing work. Work was thorough: one reviewer described a technician identifying a water leak source and completing repairs promptly, another reported commercial roof damage resolved with daily photo progress reports.
Five of six reviewers report rapid deployment to flooded basements and water-damaged homes, with crews setting up extraction equipment and returning daily to monitor drying. One complaint about warehouse logistics does not reflect the restoration work itself, which reviewers consistently describe as professional and stress-reducing.
Most positive reviews highlight rapid, organized restoration work and staff who communicate clearly and take pride in finishing touches. Reviewers mention specific team members coordinating complex projects (basement floods, fire recovery, ice dam repairs) and site cleanup that leaves basements "neat and clean." However, a consistent negative thread describes incomplete work: equipment left in basements for weeks, drywall dust and debris not cleared, damaged trim and doors, and unanswered calls when problems arise. A handful of five-star reviews praise professionalism and care; an equal number of one-star reviews cite messy exits and unresolved damage.
Only one detailed review available. The experience reported was marked by poor communication, missed commitments, and shifting timelines. Reviewer emphasizes getting everything in writing before engaging.
Strong emergency response and project coordination have won over many customers, particularly those facing major floods and fires. Giuseppe, Josh, and other named project managers earned consistent praise for responsiveness and attention. However, pricing complaints surface repeatedly-reviewers report 50% markups and hidden fees that feel opportunistic during crisis situations. Service quality varies sharply by crew: some deliver immaculate work and keep properties clean; others leave jobs only partially finished or conduct themselves unprofessionally on-site. The 3.8-star rating reflects this split, with nearly two-thirds five-star reviews offset by a substantial block of one-star accounts.
Reviewers consistently praise fast response times, even for middle-of-night calls, and polite, efficient work that minimized water damage. Staff help with insurance claims and arrive equipped to extract water quickly.
The single recent review describes professional, knowledgeable service delivered on time. Evidence is limited to one five-star account from five years ago.
Across 18 reviews spanning a decade, the business earns consistent praise for rapid response, professionalism, and leaving properties spotless. Long projects like insurance claims are handled with clear communication; emergency calls are answered the same day or faster. One reviewer noted an 11-month claim managed with steady updates.
Five-star reviews praise First General for rapid response, professional crews, and clear explanations that ease stress during water and fire damage claims. One-star complaints centre on extended project timelines, scheduling failures, office staff rudeness, and disputes over damage extent and billing.
The single review on file criticises the business for illegal signage practices on utility poles, raising concerns about their regard for community norms. Limited review evidence prevents deeper assessment of their water damage services.
One reviewer praised the team for arriving quickly and handling restoration professionally when timing was critical.
When crews arrive, most report courteous, efficient work and thorough damage assessment. But many struggle with project managers who don't return calls, scheduling windows that shift without notice, and unfinished repairs that drag on for months. The gap between on-site quality and back-office follow-through is the pattern that divides reviews.
Five-star reviews highlight fast response times, clean job sites, and capable crews who handle water damage and fire restoration with respect and care. Two one-star reviews describe extended timelines, poor finishing work, unfinished repairs, and inadequate materials handling on sewage backup jobs, leaving customers frustrated despite insurance payments. Most recent projects show consistent professionalism: teams bring protective covers, deploy equipment promptly, coordinate subcontractors quickly, and maintain open communication. However, isolated cases reveal inconsistency in workmanship quality, particularly in post-damage finishing and material accountability.
When On Side shows up and stays on task, customers report smooth water damage response and genuine care for their homes; one basement flood was completed with all three stages done quickly and professionally. Yet the pattern across one-star reviews is stark: jobs stretch into months, work gets redone multiple times, invoices arrive unexpectedly after insurance claims are supposedly settled, and project managers go silent. The split between five-star and one-star ratings (59% to 37%) suggests the business excels under certain conditions but struggles badly under others, leaving some customers feeling deliberately overcharged and abandoned mid-project.
One reviewer praised the team for removing attic mold quickly before roof work, finding the moisture source (a poorly installed bathroom vent), and working smoothly throughout. Review evidence is limited.
Renolux Restore Group wins strong marks for rapid emergency dispatch and smoothly coordinated large projects; some reviewers report lower insurance repair quotes than competitors. A significant cluster of complaints centers on billing practices: unexpected charges, scope disputes, and friction when customers question fees.
All five Google reviews are five-star. Reviewers consistently praise speed (30-minute response times) and expertise, with staff diagnosing issues accurately and saving artwork and structural property. The team handled insurance claims and worked through the night when needed.
All 17 reviews are five-star. Reviewers consistently praise rapid response during emergencies, especially the July 2024 GTA flooding, with crews arriving within hours. The team is noted for careful work, keeping properties clean, clear communication, and guiding clients through insurance claims.
The single available review is a five-star rating. Limited detail is available to assess specific strengths or service quality beyond this positive score.
Two five-star reviews praise the team's professionalism and willingness to explain the restoration process before starting work on water damage. Limited evidence from only two reviews across four years.
Two five-star reviews praise fast emergency response (25 minutes on a weekend), professional handling of water damage, and transparent pricing that worked for renters without insurance.
All four reviews are five stars. Reviewers praise fast arrival, thorough water extraction, and polite staff who explain each step. Insurance billing direct to company noted as helpful during stressful situations.
Twelve five-star reviews praise the team's professionalism, mold removal work, and swift emergency response across Hamilton and nearby regions. One scathing review documents a flood renovation that left gaps in flooring, damaged baseboards, and a basement unusable for over a year, plus alleged threats from the owner. The complaint remains unresolved.
Both reviews praise quick arrival and thorough work on sewage backups. One crew responded in 40 minutes at 2 am, completed cleanup and sanitization, then installed air filtration. Evidence is limited to two five-star reviews over five years.
Most customers report smooth, fast restoration work and excellent communication from the team, particularly during insurance claims. One detailed complaint describes a nearly year-long project with unfinished work, unresponsive follow-up, and poor subcontractor performance that left the customer frustrated and forced to complete repairs themselves.
Strong responses to fire emergencies earn consistent praise from some customers, but ongoing reconstruction work and condo repairs reveal serious gaps in project management and accountability. Reviewers describe unfinished work months after incidents, incomplete cleanup, unsupervised contractors damaging homes, and communication breakdowns that leave owners frustrated and out of pocket.
Most customers report fast response and professional crews who communicate clearly and deliver quality work. A significant minority, however, describe abandoned jobs with no follow-up contact after initial inspection or crew work, and at least one reports a technician's mischaracterization of damage may have resulted in a denied insurance claim.
Five-star reviews highlight professional teams who respond quickly to emergencies and deliver solid restoration work, particularly praised for fire cleanup and drying. However, one-star complaints dominate recent reviews: unreturned calls, repairs failing within weeks to months, floors separating, supervisors marked as rude, and repeated reports of reckless company vehicle drivers on local highways.
Praised for rapid large-scale water damage response with professional coordination, but a minority of reviewers report missed appointments and poor contractor quality on some jobs.
Five recent one-star reviews report serious issues: delayed follow-up from staff, billing disputes, subcontractor damage to property and possessions, and conflicts with insurance company. Older five-star reviews praise quick response and quality work, but the weight of recent complaints about honesty and accountability creates substantial concern. Service quality appears inconsistent across branches and hinges on which technician shows up.
All four reviews span 7 to 9 years and praise rapid arrival, professional handling of basement floods, and steady guidance. Limited recent evidence, but consistent theme: team stays on-site until stabilized and remains accessible during recovery.
One reviewer praised the team for responding quickly to basement flooding and handling the emergency professionally. Evidence is limited to a single five-star review from six years ago.
Five-star reviewers praise the Contents team as professional, efficient, and communicative during possession recovery and packing. One reviewer named Paul McBlain specifically for reliable timelines and partnership. One-star complaints centre on three patterns: fleet drivers described as aggressive and dangerous on roads (multiple incidents documented with van numbers and license plates), incomplete restoration work (one job unfinished after a year), and belongings returned damaged or missing with only $300 offered against $19,000 in insurance billing. Site cleanup and accountability remain unresolved issues across multiple reviews.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Insight Restoration delivers solid results on water and mold work, with responsive service praised by satisfied customers. However, recurring complaints about aggressive driving, incomplete follow-up, and ethical concerns during crisis calls undercut trust despite the IICRC credentials.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Staff competence earns praise, but parking conduct at job sites remains a concern. Only three reviews limit confidence in the full picture.
Good Call Restoration serves Ottawa's water, fire, and mold damage needs with a range of services including mitigation, restoration, and equipment rental. Review evidence is limited, with only 2 ratings split between top and very low scores; specific details about service quality are not available.
Paul's Restorations handles fire and water damage with speed and care. Most reviewers praise responsive staff, quality repairs, and honest dealings; one report cited poor communication and dishonesty, but the weight of evidence supports strong execution and insurance support.
Work quality is solid when jobs run smoothly, with emergency response and drying praised by satisfied customers. Project management is the weak spot: scheduling delays stretch months, communication drops off, and follow-up is inconsistent. Some customers report incomplete work or careless mistakes that required rework.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
When engaged and on-site, the team delivers skilled restoration work and treats properties with respect. However, several reviewers report the company withdrew mid-project or went silent for weeks after approval, leaving them to chase the insurance company or contractors for updates.
Most five-star reviews praise rapid arrival and solid restoration work, especially for basement floods and water damage, with staff coordinating insurance claims smoothly. Two serious complaints allege deposit disputes with mold misdiagnosis and inadequate job site cleanup, though many reviews highlight respectful, diligent teams.
All four reviewers rated the work five stars. Clients praised the team for rapid response, careful diagnosis of water damage, and transparent updates during repairs. One homeowner noted better pricing and service than the insurance company's contractor.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Strong reviews for fast basement and pipe emergency work, but a subset experienced high costs, poor follow-up work quality, and billing surprises when insurance denied claims. Detail is limited by polarized ratings (75% five-star, 25% one/two-star) spanning four years.
One older review praises swift emergency response and smooth insurance coordination; a more recent account reports dissatisfaction with service scope, equipment deployment, and a $11,000 bill that included charges for a bin never supplied. Evidence is limited across both reviews.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Absolute's work quality divides reviewers sharply. When staff engage directly on restoration jobs-flood response, mould remediation, water damage-they often earn praise for attentiveness and organization; technicians like Besi receive specific credit for careful, detailed work and communication. Yet this praise is overwhelmed by sustained complaints about reckless driving by company vehicle operators, a problem multiple reviewers say has persisted for nine years. Critical concerns emerge around restoration outcomes too. One condo project receiving $30,000 in insurance funding resulted in separating vinyl flooring and incomplete drywall repair; the project manager dismissed concerns and stopped responding after the third failed attempt. The split rating (53% five-star, 41% one/two-star) and volume of safety-focused criticism suggest internal consistency issues and possible culture misalignment between field crews.
Most customers report arriving within an hour and documenting damage for claims, though two older complaints cite communication delays and one disputes over insurance cooperation. Hardwood floor saves and basement flood recovery appear routine for the team.
All five reviews are five-star, with customers repeatedly praising fast response times, professional staff, and clear communication about the work and costs. One reviewer noted carpets were restored to like-new, another reported a basement looked brand new after mitigation.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Recent reviewers report poor communication, unmet promises, and substandard work quality. One long-standing praise for promptness exists, but current complaints center on unresponsiveness, damage to property, and failure to meet health and safety standards.
At its best, Graham delivers fast estimates and professional crews who keep homeowners informed. At its worst, the company has shown unprofessional behaviour, including a reported racial slur from staff, chronic lateness, and reluctance to prioritize smaller jobs.
Two older reviews praise the team's professionalism and fire restoration work. A recent one-star review alleges unpaid invoices over 35k and years of non-payment from the previous owner, now linked to Legacy Restoration. Review evidence is limited to 3 Google reviews spanning six years.
When The Crack Doctor's team shows up, customers praise their knowledge and professionalism. Communication breakdowns and warranty disputes dominate complaints: unreturned calls, ignored emails, and denied claims despite advertised lifetime guarantees frustrate many past clients. Review evidence is limited to foundation and basement work, not water damage directly.
Review evidence is limited. The business lists mold inspection, removal, and water damage restoration services online, and states it holds AMRT and WRT certifications with over 15 years of operating history.
ServiceMaster Restore of Orangeville claims over 50 years experience and operates as a ServiceMaster Canada licensee. Limited review evidence; pricing and service breadth are listed on their website but customer feedback is unavailable.
Water Damage Ottawa operates across Greater Ottawa with 15+ years in the field and holds IICRC Master Water Restorer certification. Review evidence is limited, so assess based on their stated service breadth and credentials alone.
No individual reviews are available yet. The business is Google-verified and operates 7 days a week across Toronto, York, and surrounding areas. Their website lists Water Damage Restoration alongside plumbing, drain services, and basement waterproofing, and claims to be licensed and insured.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review evidence is limited; the business's own website lists flood restoration, water extraction, mold remediation, and emergency cleanup across North York and surrounding areas, with pricing from $150 to $2,500 depending on service scope.
Review evidence is limited. The business lists water damage, sewage backup, mold remediation, and emergency restoration services on their website and operates 7 days a week in Markham. Without customer reviews, specific service quality cannot be assessed.
Review evidence is limited. The business claims over 15 years of operation and IICRC Master Water Restorer certification. Service area spans London, Essex, Dorchester, Stratford, and surrounding towns.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Review evidence is limited. The business claims IICRC certification and operation since 2009. Their website lists flood cleanup, water extraction, sewage backup, and burst pipe repair across Ottawa.
Review evidence is limited. The business states it holds IICRC certification, maintains full commercial and environmental liability coverage, and has served Toronto and the GTA for 19 years. Their website lists 12 services spanning fire, water, flood, sewage, mold, and plumbing emergencies available 24/7.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Not enough recent reviews yet to synthesise a reliable sentiment read for this business.
Last updated 2026-08-12